Login
Register
Questions
Hot!
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Users
Ask a Question
Welcome to EdWahoo Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
All categories
Arts & Humanities
(3)
Beauty & Style
(0)
Business & Finance
(1)
Cars & Transportation
(0)
Computers & Internet
(1)
Consumer Electronics
(0)
Dining Out
(0)
Education & Reference
(10)
Entertainment & Music
(0)
Environment
(0)
Family & Relationships
(8)
Food & Drink
(0)
Games & Recreation
(0)
Health
(10)
Home & Garden
(3)
Local Businesses
(2)
News & Events
(0)
Pets
(1)
Politics & Covernment
(1)
Pregnancy & Parenting
(0)
Science & Mathematics
(0)
Social Science
(4)
Society & Culture
(5)
Sports
(0)
Travel
(1)
50
questions
47
answers
1
comment
37
users
Most popular tags
law
family
jobs
neighbour
workplace
education
legal
health
Homeowning May Not Mean Signposting
0
votes
Does a homeowners' association have the right to restrict political signs, such as Bush for President? Doesn't restricting this violate my First Amendment rights?
home
asked
8 months
ago
in
Home & Garden
by
testike
(
3,040
points)
Tweet
Your comment on this question:
Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:
Email me if a comment is added after mine
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
To avoid this verification in future, please
log in
or
register
.
1 Answer
0
votes
The answer to your question is that there is no definitive answer to it just yet. The political sign question is up in the air and in the courts. So far, there have been some court decisions allowing those in hub of homeowners' associations to distribute literature that would seem to set some direction for the political sign question you raise.
So far, disputes that have been resolved informally have been split right down the middle. Half have been resolved in favor of complying with homeowners' associations rules and remaining signless -- this, on the reasoning that you agreed to give up rights when you purchased as you did. But other tiffs have gone the way you infer; the rules have been trumped by homeowners' First Amendment rights to express whatever they darn well please.
Given the current climate and the number of these disputes gasping to be aired, it is likely that this issue will end up in the U.S. Supreme Court. If I were the soothsaying sort, I would predict that a compromise will be reached; signs might be allowed, but will have to comply with size and location restrictions.
answered
8 months
ago
by
testike
(
3,040
points)
Your comment on this answer:
Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:
Email me if a comment is added after mine
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
To avoid this verification in future, please
log in
or
register
.
Related questions
0
votes
1
answer
Sappy Start, Happy Ending
asked
8 months
ago
in
Home & Garden
by
testike
(
3,040
points)
garden
home
0
votes
1
answer
Three Strikes, You May Be In
asked
8 months
ago
in
Social Science
by
testike
(
3,040
points)
law
0
votes
1
answer
Bad Things Underfoot
asked
8 months
ago
in
Home & Garden
by
testike
(
3,040
points)
garden
neighbour
+1
vote
1
answer
Proving a Worker Is Not an Employee
asked
8 months
ago
in
Society & Culture
by
testike
(
3,040
points)
internet
business
0
votes
1
answer
My elderly parents see a doctor who takes "medicare assignment", what does that mean?
asked
8 months
ago
in
Health
by
testike
(
3,040
points)